FINAL 10/05

Recap
Box Score
Team Stats
Awards
Matchup

	S1	S2	Wins
CCCHS	25	25	2
SP	12	15	0

Final score provided by W. Hensley.

Marauders

Chargers

Attacking

	SP	K	K/S	Kill %	Att	E	Hit %
#1 I. Pereira	2	9	4.5	69.2	13	0	.692
#2 K. Henwood	2
#3 S. Rizzi	2	2	1.0	33.3	6	0	.333
#4 A. Rupp	2
#6 H. Jaffe	2	3	1.5	16.7	18	2	.056
#7 F. Webster	2
#9 K. Ruppel	2	2	1.0	100.0	2	0	1.000
#10 S. Williams	2	4	2.0	40.0	10	1	.300
#12 M. Neel	2
#13 C. Mustafaraj	2	3	1.5	42.9	7	1	.286
#16 M. Typrowicz	2
#24 J. Hensley	2	5	2.5	35.7	14	0	.357

Attacking

	SP	K	K/S	Kill %	Att	E	Hit %
#1 H. Zielinski	2	1	0.5	25.0	4	0	.250
#2 N. Downs	1	0	0.0	.0	0	0
#3 A. Stanton	2	0	0.0	.0	0	0
#4 C. Satterfield	2	4	2.0	25.0	16	5	-.062
#5 S. Ferris	1	0	0.0	.0	0	0
#6 A. Gurievsky	2	1	0.5	11.1	9	1	.000
#7 B. Furman	1	0	0.0	.0	0	0
#8 G. Bessolo	1	0	0.0	.0	2	0	.000
#9 O. Nicklaus	2	1	0.5	20.0	5	1	.000
#10 M. Harrington	2	3	1.5	21.4	14	1	.143
#11 C. Bean	2	0	0.0	.0	0	0
#12 E. Satterfield	2	7	3.5	35.0	20	2	.250

Serving

	SP	A	A/S	Ace %	SA	SE	Serv %
#1 I. Pereira	2	0	0.0	.0	6	0	100.0
#2 K. Henwood	2	1	0.5	25.0	4	1	75.0
#3 S. Rizzi	2	0	0.0	.0	1	0	100.0
#4 A. Rupp	2	0	0.0	.0	8	1	87.5
#6 H. Jaffe	2
#7 F. Webster	2	0	0.0	.0	5	0	100.0
#9 K. Ruppel	2
#10 S. Williams	2
#12 M. Neel	2
#13 C. Mustafaraj	2
#16 M. Typrowicz	2	2	1.0	33.3	6	0	100.0
#24 J. Hensley	2	2	1.0	22.2	9	0	100.0

Serving

	SP	A	A/S	Ace %	SA	SE	Serv %
#1 H. Zielinski	2	0	0.0	.0	2	0	100.0
#2 N. Downs	1	0	0.0	.0	0	0
#3 A. Stanton	2	0	0.0	.0	4	0	100.0
#4 C. Satterfield	2	0	0.0	.0	4	1	75.0
#5 S. Ferris	1	0	0.0	.0	0	0
#6 A. Gurievsky	2	1	0.5	11.1	9	0	100.0
#7 B. Furman	1	0	0.0	.0	0	0
#8 G. Bessolo	1	0	0.0	.0	0	0
#9 O. Nicklaus	2	0	0.0	.0	1	0	100.0
#10 M. Harrington	2	0	0.0	.0	1	0	100.0
#11 C. Bean	2	0	0.0	.0	0	0
#12 E. Satterfield	2	1	0.5	16.7	6	0	100.0

Blocking

	SP	BS	BA	Tot Blks	B/S	BE
#1 I. Pereira	2
#2 K. Henwood	2
#3 S. Rizzi	2
#4 A. Rupp	2
#6 H. Jaffe	2
#7 F. Webster	2
#9 K. Ruppel	2
#10 S. Williams	2	2	0	2	1.0	0
#12 M. Neel	2	1	0	1	0.5	0
#13 C. Mustafaraj	2	2	1	3	1.5	0
#16 M. Typrowicz	2
#24 J. Hensley	2	1	1	2	1.0	0

Blocking

	SP	BS	BA	Tot Blks	B/S	BE
#1 H. Zielinski	2	0	0	0	0.0	0
#2 N. Downs	1	0	0	0	0.0	0
#3 A. Stanton	2	0	0	0	0.0	0
#4 C. Satterfield	2	0	0	0	0.0	0
#5 S. Ferris	1	0	0	0	0.0	0
#6 A. Gurievsky	2	0	0	0	0.0	0
#7 B. Furman	1	0	0	0	0.0	0
#8 G. Bessolo	1	0	0	0	0.0	0
#9 O. Nicklaus	2	0	0	0	0.0	0
#10 M. Harrington	2	0	0	0	0.0	0
#11 C. Bean	2	0	0	0	0.0	0
#12 E. Satterfield	2	0	0	0	0.0	0

Digging

	SP	D	DE	D/S
#1 I. Pereira	2	9	0	4.5
#2 K. Henwood	2	2	3	1.0
#3 S. Rizzi	2	3	2	1.5
#4 A. Rupp	2	5	1	2.5
#6 H. Jaffe	2	3	0	1.5
#7 F. Webster	2	1	0	0.5
#9 K. Ruppel	2
#10 S. Williams	2
#12 M. Neel	2	0	1	0.0
#13 C. Mustafaraj	2
#16 M. Typrowicz	2	7	2	3.5
#24 J. Hensley	2	2	1	1.0

Digging

	SP	D	D/S
#1 H. Zielinski	2	3	1.5
#2 N. Downs	1	1	1.0
#3 A. Stanton	2	5	2.5
#4 C. Satterfield	2	7	3.5
#5 S. Ferris	1	0	0.0
#6 A. Gurievsky	2	3	1.5
#7 B. Furman	1	0	0.0
#8 G. Bessolo	1	0	0.0
#9 O. Nicklaus	2	1	0.5
#10 M. Harrington	2	1	0.5
#11 C. Bean	2	0	0.0
#12 E. Satterfield	2	6	3.0

Ball Handling

	SP	Ast	Ast/S	BHE
#1 I. Pereira	2	1	0.5	0
#2 K. Henwood	2	1	0.5
#3 S. Rizzi	2
#4 A. Rupp	2
#6 H. Jaffe	2
#7 F. Webster	2
#9 K. Ruppel	2
#10 S. Williams	2
#12 M. Neel	2
#13 C. Mustafaraj	2
#16 M. Typrowicz	2	1	0.5
#24 J. Hensley	2	21	10.5

Ball Handling

	SP	Ast	Ast/S	BHA
#1 H. Zielinski	2	13	6.5	52
#2 N. Downs	1	0	0.0	0
#3 A. Stanton	2	0	0.0	5
#4 C. Satterfield	2	1	0.5	2
#5 S. Ferris	1	1	1.0	3
#6 A. Gurievsky	2	0	0.0	0
#7 B. Furman	1	0	0.0	0
#8 G. Bessolo	1	0	0.0	0
#9 O. Nicklaus	2	0	0.0	1
#10 M. Harrington	2	0	0.0	0
#11 C. Bean	2	0	0.0	0
#12 E. Satterfield	2	0	0.0	0

Serve Receiving

	SP	R	RE	R/S
#1 I. Pereira	2	3	0	1.5
#2 K. Henwood	2	2	0	1.0
#3 S. Rizzi	2	2	0	1.0
#4 A. Rupp	2	6	3	3.0
#6 H. Jaffe	2
#7 F. Webster	2
#9 K. Ruppel	2
#10 S. Williams	2	1	0	0.5
#12 M. Neel	2
#13 C. Mustafaraj	2
#16 M. Typrowicz	2	4	1	2.0
#24 J. Hensley	2

Serve Receiving

	SP	R	RE	R/S
#1 H. Zielinski	2	0	0	0.0
#2 N. Downs	1	2	0	2.0
#3 A. Stanton	2	9	0	4.5
#4 C. Satterfield	2	7	0	3.5
#5 S. Ferris	1	0	0	0.0
#6 A. Gurievsky	2	1	0	0.5
#7 B. Furman	1	0	0	0.0
#8 G. Bessolo	1	0	0	0.0
#9 O. Nicklaus	2	4	0	2.0
#10 M. Harrington	2	1	0	0.5
#11 C. Bean	2	0	0	0.0
#12 E. Satterfield	2	7	3	3.5

Team summary

Kills Per Set

CCCHS

14.0

8.5

Hitting Percentage

CCCHS

.343

.100

Total Blocks

CCCHS

Digs Per Set

CCCHS

21.0

13.5

Serving Aces

CCCHS

Aces Per Set

CCCHS

4.0

1.0

Digs

CCCHS

Assists

CCCHS

Kills

CCCHS

Receptions

CCCHS

VIEW ALL

Attacking

K/S

14.0

8.5

Kill %

40.0

24.3

Att

Hit %

.343

.100

Serving

A/S

4.0

1.0

Ace %

16.3

7.4

Serv %

93.9

96.3

Blocking

Tot Blks

B/S

3.5

0.0

Digging

D/S

21.0

13.5

Ball Handling

Ast

Ast/S

12.5

7.5

BHA

Serve Receiving

R/S

13.5

15.5

Florida High School Volleyball - Clearwater Central Catholic over Shorecrest Prep

October 5, 2024: St. Petersburg, FL 33703

Fans at Saturday's non-league contest between the Clearwater Central Catholic Marauders (Clearwater, FL) and the host Shorecrest Prep Chargers (St. Petersburg, FL), observed Clearwater Central Catholic's volleyball team top Shorecrest Prep by a tally of 2-0.

The Marauders (14-9) will now prepare for their contest against Tampa Catholic (Tampa, FL). The Crusaders enter the non-league contest with a 11-7 record. In their last contest, Tampa Catholic was beaten by Northside Christian (St. Petersburg, FL), 3-0, in a non-league contest.

Next, the Chargers meet the St. Petersburg Green Devils (St. Petersburg, FL) in a non-league contest, on Saturday, October 5. Shorecrest Prep will attempt to upgrade on its 9-6 season record. The Green Devils enter the contest with a 8-6 record after their 3-2 non-league win over Boca Ciega (Gulfport, FL).

Clearwater Central Catholic

Congratulations to #8 Kaelee Lannon for being selected the Clearwater Central Catholic Volleyball Player of the Match.
Share

CCCHS @ SP Volleyball Match Info

Sat., Oct. 5, 2024 @ 1:30p

Shorecrest Tournament

The Shorecrest Prep (St. Petersburg, FL) varsity volleyball team lost Saturday's home tournament match against Clearwater Central Catholic (Clearwater, FL) by a score of 2-0.