Cedarburg vs Watertown | Volleyball

FINAL 9/23

Recap
Box Score
Team Stats
Videos
Matchup

	S1	S2	Wins
CHS	25	25	2
WHS	18	23	0

Final score provided by K. Becker.

Bulldogs

Goslings

Attacking

	SP	K	K/S	Kill %	Att	E	Hit %
#1 J. Fitting	2	0	0.0	.0	1	0	.000
#2 O. Friedl	2	0	0.0	.0	0	0
#3 S. Prom	2	0	0.0	.0	1	0	.000
#4 C. Wills	2	4	2.0	33.3	12	3	.083
#5 N. Fernald	2	4	2.0	36.4	11	0	.364
#5 L. Pahl	2	1	0.5	8.3	12	4	-.250
#6 L. Lanning	2	0	0.0	.0	0	0
#8 C. Gall	2	5	2.5	35.7	14	1	.286
#10 K. Peterson	2	4	2.0	57.1	7	0	.571
#11 E. Jones	2	1	0.5	100.0	1	0	1.000
#12 A. Lecavalier	2	5	2.5	45.5	11	1	.364

Attacking

	SP	K	K/S	Kill %	Att	E	Hit %
#1 L. Hickey	2	0	0.0	.0	0	0
#2 K. Feder	2	0	0.0	.0	0	0
#3 C. Peplinski	2	0	0.0	.0	0	0
#4 K. Braatz	2	3	1.5	16.7	18	3	.000
#5 O. Gwidt	2	0	0.0	.0	0	0
#6 A. Zerjav	1	1	1.0	16.7	6	1	.000
#9 A. Walsh	2	6	3.0	46.2	13	2	.308
#11 A. Denault	2	0	0.0	.0	8	3	-.375
#12 A. Hesse	2	6	3.0	75.0	8	0	.750
#13 P. Roets	2	1	0.5	25.0	4	1	.000
#15 L. Spende	2	4	2.0	80.0	5	1	.600

Serving

	SP	A	A/S	Ace %	SA	SE	Serv %	PTS
#1 J. Fitting	2	3	1.5	33.3	9	0	100.0	5
#2 O. Friedl	2	0	0.0	.0	1	0	100.0	0
#3 S. Prom	2	1	0.5	12.5	8	1	87.5	4
#4 C. Wills	2	0	0.0	.0	0	0		0
#5 N. Fernald	2	0	0.0	.0	0	0		0
#5 L. Pahl	2	1	0.5	11.1	9	1	88.9	5
#6 L. Lanning	2	0	0.0	.0	0	0		0
#8 C. Gall	2	2	1.0	25.0	8	1	87.5	5
#10 K. Peterson	2	0	0.0	.0	0	0		0
#11 E. Jones	2	0	0.0	.0	8	0	100.0	4
#12 A. Lecavalier	2	0	0.0	.0	5	1	80.0	2

Serving

	SP	A	A/S	Ace %	SA	SE	Serv %
#1 L. Hickey	2	0	0.0	.0	5	1	80.0
#2 K. Feder	2	3	1.5	37.5	8	1	87.5
#3 C. Peplinski	2	0	0.0	.0	0	0
#4 K. Braatz	2	0	0.0	.0	0	0
#5 O. Gwidt	2	0	0.0	.0	4	0	100.0
#6 A. Zerjav	1	0	0.0	.0	0	0
#9 A. Walsh	2	0	0.0	.0	0	0
#11 A. Denault	2	0	0.0	.0	6	1	83.3
#12 A. Hesse	2	0	0.0	.0	0	0
#13 P. Roets	2	1	0.5	9.1	11	0	100.0
#15 L. Spende	2	0	0.0	.0	6	1	83.3

Blocking

	SP	BS	Tot Blks	B/S
#1 J. Fitting	2	0	0	0.0
#2 O. Friedl	2	0	0	0.0
#3 S. Prom	2	0	0	0.0
#4 C. Wills	2	0	0	0.0
#5 N. Fernald	2	1	1	0.5
#5 L. Pahl	2	0	0	0.0
#6 L. Lanning	2	0	0	0.0
#8 C. Gall	2	3	3	1.5
#10 K. Peterson	2	0	0	0.0
#11 E. Jones	2	0	0	0.0
#12 A. Lecavalier	2	0	0	0.0

Blocking

	SP	BS	Tot Blks	B/S	BE
#1 L. Hickey	2	0	0	0.0	0
#2 K. Feder	2	0	0	0.0	0
#3 C. Peplinski	2	0	0	0.0	0
#4 K. Braatz	2	0	0	0.0	0
#5 O. Gwidt	2	0	0	0.0	0
#6 A. Zerjav	1	0	0	0.0	0
#9 A. Walsh	2	1	1	0.5	1
#11 A. Denault	2	0	0	0.0	0
#12 A. Hesse	2	0	0	0.0	1
#13 P. Roets	2	0	0	0.0	0
#15 L. Spende	2	0	0	0.0	0

Digging

	SP	D	D/S
#1 J. Fitting	2	10	5.0
#2 O. Friedl	2	2	1.0
#3 S. Prom	2	5	2.5
#4 C. Wills	2	1	0.5
#5 N. Fernald	2	1	0.5
#5 L. Pahl	2	4	2.0
#6 L. Lanning	2	5	2.5
#8 C. Gall	2	0	0.0
#10 K. Peterson	2	0	0.0
#11 E. Jones	2	1	0.5
#12 A. Lecavalier	2	2	1.0

Digging

	SP	D	DE	D/S
#1 L. Hickey	2	1	0	0.5
#2 K. Feder	2	12	4	6.0
#3 C. Peplinski	2	6	1	3.0
#4 K. Braatz	2	4	0	2.0
#5 O. Gwidt	2	4	0	2.0
#6 A. Zerjav	1	1	0	1.0
#9 A. Walsh	2	3	0	1.5
#11 A. Denault	2	4	4	2.0
#12 A. Hesse	2	1	0	0.5
#13 P. Roets	2	5	4	2.5
#15 L. Spende	2	4	2	2.0

Ball Handling

	SP	Ast	Ast/S	BHA	BHE
#1 J. Fitting	2	1	0.5	7	0
#2 O. Friedl	2	0	0.0	0	0
#3 S. Prom	2	11	5.5	34	0
#4 C. Wills	2	0	0.0	0	1
#5 N. Fernald	2	0	0.0	1	0
#5 L. Pahl	2	0	0.0	0	1
#6 L. Lanning	2	0	0.0	0	0
#8 C. Gall	2	0	0.0	0	0
#10 K. Peterson	2	0	0.0	0	0
#11 E. Jones	2	11	5.5	24	1
#12 A. Lecavalier	2	0	0.0	0	0

Ball Handling

	SP	Ast	Ast/S	BHA
#1 L. Hickey	2	0	0.0	0
#2 K. Feder	2	5	2.5	10
#3 C. Peplinski	2	0	0.0	0
#4 K. Braatz	2	0	0.0	0
#5 O. Gwidt	2	0	0.0	0
#6 A. Zerjav	1	0	0.0	0
#9 A. Walsh	2	0	0.0	1
#11 A. Denault	2	0	0.0	0
#12 A. Hesse	2	0	0.0	0
#13 P. Roets	2	16	8.0	63
#15 L. Spende	2	0	0.0	0

Serve Receiving

	SP	R	RE	R/S
#1 J. Fitting	2	12	1	6.0
#2 O. Friedl	2	3	0	1.5
#3 S. Prom	2	0	0	0.0
#4 C. Wills	2	3	0	1.5
#5 N. Fernald	2	0	0	0.0
#5 L. Pahl	2	4	0	2.0
#6 L. Lanning	2	10	2	5.0
#8 C. Gall	2	0	0	0.0
#10 K. Peterson	2	0	0	0.0
#11 E. Jones	2	0	0	0.0
#12 A. Lecavalier	2	3	1	1.5

Serve Receiving

	SP	R	RE	R/S
#1 L. Hickey	2	0	0	0.0
#2 K. Feder	2	10	3	5.0
#3 C. Peplinski	2	6	3	3.0
#4 K. Braatz	2	2	0	1.0
#5 O. Gwidt	2	6	3	3.0
#6 A. Zerjav	1	2	0	2.0
#9 A. Walsh	2	1	1	0.5
#11 A. Denault	2	10	3	5.0
#12 A. Hesse	2	1	0	0.5
#13 P. Roets	2	0	1	0.0
#15 L. Spende	2	1	0	0.5

Team summary

Kills Per Set

CHS

12.0

WHS

10.5

Hitting Percentage

CHS

.214

WHS

.161

Total Blocks

CHS

WHS

Digs Per Set

CHS

15.5

WHS

22.5

Serving Aces

CHS

WHS

Aces Per Set

CHS

3.5

WHS

2.0

Digs

CHS

WHS

Assists

CHS

WHS

Kills

CHS

WHS

Receptions

CHS

WHS

VIEW ALL

Attacking

K/S

12.0

10.5

Kill %

34.3

33.9

Att

Hit %

.214

.161

Serving

A/S

3.5

2.0

Ace %

14.6

10.0

Serv %

91.7

90.0

PTS

Blocking

Tot Blks

B/S

2.0

0.5

Digging

D/S

15.5

22.5

Ball Handling

Ast

Ast/S

11.5

10.5

BHA

BHE

Serve Receiving

R/S

17.5

19.5

1:38 Cedarburg vs Watertown Game Highlights - Sept. 23, 2022

Wisconsin High School Volleyball - Cedarburg over Watertown

September 23, 2022: Cedarburg, WI 53012

In Friday's non-league contest, the Cedarburg Bulldogs (Cedarburg, WI) volleyball squad knocked off the visiting Watertown Goslings (Watertown, WI), by a margin of 2-0.

Next up, the Bulldogs battle the Oshkosh West Wildcats (Oshkosh, WI) in a non-league contest, on Saturday, September 24. Cedarburg will attempt to better on its 6-18 season record. The Wildcats come into the contest with a 12-19 record after their 2-0 non-league loss to Menomonee Falls (Menomonee Falls, WI).

With the loss, Watertown drops to 17-13 on the campaign. The Goslings travel to Kimberly (Kimberly, WI) to battle the Papermakers in a non-league contest on Friday, September 23. The Papermakers come into the contest with a record of 15-7. Kimberly won 3-0 in their recent league contest against Oshkosh North (Oshkosh, WI)