NDA16-21

FINAL 10/05

Recap
Box Score
Team Stats
Matchup

	S1	S2	Wins
NDA	13	22	0
KHS	25	25	2

Final score provided by M. Pearson.

Tritons

Papermakers

Attacking

	SP	K	K/S	Kill %	Att	E	Hit %
#1 L. Waldrop	2	0	0.0	.0	0	0
#2 I. Fergus	1	0	0.0	.0	0	0
#3 K. Kline	2	0	0.0	.0	1	1	-1.000
#6 Penzenstadle...	2	0	0.0	.0	5	3	-.600
#8 L. Moore	2	3	1.5	27.3	11	1	.182
#9 C. Budinger	2	0	0.0	.0	5	1	-.200
#11 M. Wolfram	2	0	0.0	.0	0	0
#12 A. Madson	2	0	0.0	.0	1	1	-1.000
#13 K. Waldrop	2	2	1.0	28.6	7	1	.143
#14 A. Danen	2	9	4.5	47.4	19	2	.368
#15 E. Lund	1	0	0.0	.0	1	0	.000
#18 E. Ciak	1	0	0.0	.0	2	0	.000

Attacking

	SP	K	K/S	Kill %	Att	E	Hit %
#1 A. Van hammond	2	0	0.0	.0	0	0
#2 H. Van lannen	2	3	1.5	27.3	11	4	-.091
#3 F. Van lannen	2	0	0.0	.0	0	0
#4 A. Van camp	2	0	0.0	.0	0	0
#7 E. Bies	2	3	1.5	30.0	10	2	.100
#9 B. Lamers	2	0	0.0	.0	0	0
#10 A. Van vonderen	2	6	3.0	46.2	13	3	.231
#12 K. Brochtrup	2	1	0.5	33.3	3	1	.000
#13 E. Tesch	2	0	0.0	.0	0	0
#14 A. Reis	2	7	3.5	53.8	13	1	.462
#15 K. Ver bockel	2	4	2.0	66.7	6	1	.500

Serving

	SP	A	A/S	Ace %	SA	SE	Serv %	PTS
#1 L. Waldrop	2	1	0.5	25.0	4	0	100.0	1
#2 I. Fergus	1	0	0.0	.0	0	0		0
#3 K. Kline	2	1	0.5	11.1	9	1	88.9	5
#6 Penzenstadle...	2	0	0.0	.0	0	0		0
#8 L. Moore	2	0	0.0	.0	0	0		0
#9 C. Budinger	2	0	0.0	.0	3	0	100.0	0
#11 M. Wolfram	2	0	0.0	.0	5	0	100.0	0
#12 A. Madson	2	1	0.5	16.7	6	0	100.0	3
#13 K. Waldrop	2	0	0.0	.0	0	0		0
#14 A. Danen	2	3	1.5	30.0	10	1	90.0	6
#15 E. Lund	1	0	0.0	.0	0	0		0
#18 E. Ciak	1	0	0.0	.0	0	0		0

Serving

	SP	A	A/S	Ace %	SA	SE	Serv %	PTS
#1 A. Van hammond	2	1	0.5	12.5	8	0	100.0	5
#2 H. Van lannen	2	0	0.0	.0	0	0		0
#3 F. Van lannen	2	1	0.5	25.0	4	1	75.0	1
#4 A. Van camp	2	0	0.0	.0	6	1	83.3	2
#7 E. Bies	2	0	0.0	.0	0	0		0
#9 B. Lamers	2	5	2.5	33.3	15	1	93.3	12
#10 A. Van vonderen	2	0	0.0	.0	9	0	100.0	5
#12 K. Brochtrup	2	0	0.0	.0	0	0		0
#13 E. Tesch	2	0	0.0	.0	5	0	100.0	2
#14 A. Reis	2	0	0.0	.0	1	0	100.0	0
#15 K. Ver bockel	2	0	0.0	.0	0	0		0

Blocking

	SP	BA	Tot Blks	B/S
#1 L. Waldrop	2	0	0	0.0
#2 I. Fergus	1	0	0	0.0
#3 K. Kline	2	0	0	0.0
#6 Penzenstadle...	2	0	0	0.0
#8 L. Moore	2	0	0	0.0
#9 C. Budinger	2	1	1	0.5
#11 M. Wolfram	2	0	0	0.0
#12 A. Madson	2	0	0	0.0
#13 K. Waldrop	2	1	1	0.5
#14 A. Danen	2	1	1	0.5
#15 E. Lund	1	0	0	0.0
#18 E. Ciak	1	1	1	1.0

Blocking

	SP	BA	Tot Blks	B/S
#1 A. Van hammond	2	0	0	0.0
#2 H. Van lannen	2	0	0	0.0
#3 F. Van lannen	2	0	0	0.0
#4 A. Van camp	2	0	0	0.0
#7 E. Bies	2	2	2	1.0
#9 B. Lamers	2	0	0	0.0
#10 A. Van vonderen	2	1	1	0.5
#12 K. Brochtrup	2	1	1	0.5
#13 E. Tesch	2	0	0	0.0
#14 A. Reis	2	1	1	0.5
#15 K. Ver bockel	2	1	1	0.5

Digging

	SP	D	D/S
#1 L. Waldrop	2	5	2.5
#2 I. Fergus	1	0	0.0
#3 K. Kline	2	4	2.0
#6 C. Penzenstadler	2	1	0.5
#8 L. Moore	2	0	0.0
#9 C. Budinger	2	1	0.5
#11 M. Wolfram	2	3	1.5
#12 A. Madson	2	1	0.5
#13 K. Waldrop	2	0	0.0
#14 A. Danen	2	3	1.5
#15 E. Lund	1	0	0.0
#18 E. Ciak	1	0	0.0

Digging

	SP	D	D/S
#1 A. Van hammond	2	2	1.0
#2 H. Van lannen	2	1	0.5
#3 F. Van lannen	2	2	1.0
#4 A. Van camp	2	5	2.5
#7 E. Bies	2	0	0.0
#9 B. Lamers	2	2	1.0
#10 A. Van vonderen	2	7	3.5
#12 K. Brochtrup	2	1	0.5
#13 E. Tesch	2	3	1.5
#14 A. Reis	2	0	0.0
#15 K. Ver bockel	2	0	0.0

Ball Handling

	SP	Ast	Ast/S	BHA
#1 L. Waldrop	2	0	0.0	0
#2 I. Fergus	1	0	0.0	0
#3 K. Kline	2	8	4.0	22
#6 Penzenstadle...	2	0	0.0	1
#8 L. Moore	2	0	0.0	0
#9 C. Budinger	2	0	0.0	0
#11 M. Wolfram	2	2	1.0	9
#12 A. Madson	2	3	1.5	15
#13 K. Waldrop	2	0	0.0	0
#14 A. Danen	2	0	0.0	2
#15 E. Lund	1	1	1.0	1
#18 E. Ciak	1	0	0.0	1

Ball Handling

	SP	Ast	Ast/S	BHA
#1 A. Van hammond	2	11	5.5	30
#2 H. Van lannen	2	0	0.0	0
#3 F. Van lannen	2	0	0.0	0
#4 A. Van camp	2	1	0.5	3
#7 E. Bies	2	0	0.0	0
#9 B. Lamers	2	0	0.0	0
#10 A. Van vonderen	2	1	0.5	1
#12 K. Brochtrup	2	0	0.0	0
#13 E. Tesch	2	10	5.0	18
#14 A. Reis	2	0	0.0	0
#15 K. Ver bockel	2	1	0.5	2

Serve Receiving

	SP	R	RE	R/S
#1 L. Waldrop	2	7	1	3.5
#2 I. Fergus	1	1	0	1.0
#3 K. Kline	2	1	0	0.5
#6 C. Penzenstadler	2	2	0	1.0
#8 L. Moore	2	5	1	2.5
#9 C. Budinger	2	0	0	0.0
#11 M. Wolfram	2	10	1	5.0
#12 A. Madson	2	0	0	0.0
#13 K. Waldrop	2	0	1	0.0
#14 A. Danen	2	10	3	5.0
#15 E. Lund	1	0	0	0.0
#18 E. Ciak	1	0	0	0.0

Serve Receiving

	SP	R	RE	R/S
#1 A. Van hammond	2	0	0	0.0
#2 H. Van lannen	2	0	0	0.0
#3 F. Van lannen	2	2	0	1.0
#4 A. Van camp	2	15	3	7.5
#7 E. Bies	2	0	0	0.0
#9 B. Lamers	2	0	0	0.0
#10 A. Van vonderen	2	9	1	4.5
#12 K. Brochtrup	2	0	0	0.0
#13 E. Tesch	2	0	0	0.0
#14 A. Reis	2	3	0	1.5
#15 K. Ver bockel	2	0	0	0.0

Team summary

Kills Per Set

NDA

7.0

KHS

12.0

Hitting Percentage

NDA

.077

KHS

.214

Total Blocks

NDA

KHS

Digs Per Set

NDA

9.0

KHS

11.5

Serving Aces

NDA

KHS

Aces Per Set

NDA

3.0

KHS

3.5

Digs

NDA

KHS

Assists

NDA

KHS

Kills

NDA

KHS

Receptions

NDA

KHS

VIEW ALL

Attacking

K/S

7.0

12.0

Kill %

26.9

42.9

Att

Hit %

.077

.214

Serving

A/S

3.0

3.5

Ace %

16.2

14.6

Serv %

94.6

93.8

PTS

Blocking

Tot Blks

B/S

1.0

1.5

Digging

D/S

9.0

11.5

Ball Handling

Ast

Ast/S

7.0

12.0

BHA

Serve Receiving

R/S

18.0

14.5

Wisconsin High School Volleyball - Notre Dame Academy Kimberly

October 5, 2024: Green Bay, WI 54303

The Kimberly Papermakers topped the host Notre Dame Academy Tritons volleyball squad by a final score of 2-0 in Saturday's non-league game.

Next up, the Papermakers confront the Hortonville Polar Bears (Hortonville, WI) in a non-league game, on Saturday, October 5. Kimberly will attempt to advance on its 23-10 season record. The Polar Bears go into the game with a 4-15 record after their 3-0 league loss to Neenah (Neenah, WI).

The Tritons (11-18) will now prepare for their game against De Pere (De Pere, WI). The Redbirds go into the non-league game with a 13-15 record. In their last game, De Pere went down by Green Bay Southwest (Green Bay, WI), 3-0, in a league game.