21
48
FINAL 11/03
  • Recap
  • Box Score
  • Team Stats
  • Matchup
Q1Q2Q3Q4Final
THS
7001421
SSHS
20147748
Final score provided by S. Zogg.

Team Totals

TimberlakeStatSugar-Salem
65Total Plays46
16First Downs21
4Penalties3
30Penalty Yards23
29:43Possession Time18:17
Tigers
Diggers

Offense - Passing

CAttYdsC%AvgIntLngQB Rate
#12 C. Meidinger1626183.61511.423450.6

Offense - Rushing

CarYdsAvgLng100+TD
#1 C. Lenz19512.71101
#11 C. Tebbe7294.11001
#12 C. Meidinger591.8150
#33 V. Higgins7233.3100
#44 J. Hansen111.010

Offense - Receiving

RecYdsAvgLng
#1 C. Lenz79914.134
#4 J. Yetter66911.526
#11 C. Tebbe122.02
#21 A. Simmons177.07
#44 J. Hansen166.06

Offense - All Purpose Yards

Offense - Total Yards

Defense - Sacks

Sacks
#71 J. Hurlbert1.0

Defense - Defensive Statistics

Special Teams - Kickoff and Punt Returns

KO RetsYdsAvgLngKR Yds
#1 C. Lenz36421.32364
#4 J. Yetter22914.51729

Scoring - Points

TDsTD PtsKick PtsTot Pts
#1 C. Lenz21212
#11 C. Tebbe166
#33 V. Higgins33

Scoring - PATs and Field Goals

PATAtt%Tot Pts
#33 V. Higgins331.03

Scoring - Touchdowns

TD RushTD IRTotal
#1 C. Lenz112
#11 C. Tebbe11

Team summary

Total TDs
THS
3
SSHS
7
Sacks
THS
1.0
SSHS
2.0
Interceptions
THS
1
SSHS
2
Passing TDs
THS
SSHS
3
Receiving TDs
THS
SSHS
3
Rushing TDs
THS
2
SSHS
4
Caused Fumbles
THS
SSHS
1
Fumble Recoveries
THS
2
SSHS
QB Hurries
THS
SSHS
3
Completion Percentage
THS
.615
SSHS
.833
QB Rating
THS
50.6
SSHS
140.0
VIEW ALL

Offense

Passing
C
16
15
Att
26
18
Yds
183
260
C%
.615
.833
Avg
11.4
17.3
TD
-
3
Int
2
1
Lng
34
59
QB Rate
50.6
140.0
Rushing
Car
39
28
Yds
113
207
Avg
2.9
7.4
Lng
15
42
TD
2
4
Receiving
Rec
16
15
Yds
183
260
Avg
11.4
17.3
Lng
34
59
TD
-
3
All Purpose Yards
KR
93
58
IR
-
28
Total
389
553
Total Yards
Total
296
467

Defense

Tackles
Solo
39
31
Asst
22
54
Tot Tckls
61
85
TFL
1.0
5.0
Sacks
Sacks
1.0
2.0
Ydl
-
16
Hurs
-
3
Defensive Statistics
Int
1
2
Int Yds
-
28
Avg
-
14.0
PD
1
7
Fmb Rec
2
-
Caus
-
1

Special Teams

Kickoffs
KO
-
8
Yds
-
307
Avg
-
38.4
Kickoff and Punt Returns
KO Rets
5
4
Yds
93
58
Avg
18.6
14.5
Lng
23
33
KR Yds
93
58

Scoring

Points
TDs
3
7
TD Pts
18
42
Kick Pts
3
6
Tot Pts
21
48
PATs and Field Goals
PAT
3
6
Att
3
7
%
1.0
.9
Touchdowns
TD Rush
2
4
TD Rec
-
3
TD IR
1
-

Idaho High School Football - Timberlake topped by Sugar-Salem

November 3, 2023: Spirit Lake, ID 83869

The Timberlake Tigers football team (Spirit Lake, ID), dropped 48-21 in Friday's non-league match with the visiting Sugar-Salem Diggers (Sugar City, ID)

In their next game, the Diggers clash with the Weiser Wolverines (Weiser, ID) in a non-league match, on Friday, November 10. Sugar-Salem will attempt to move on its 9-0 season record. The Wolverines enter the match with a 10-1 record after their 35-32 non-league win over Kimberly (Kimberly, ID).

Timberlake vs Sugar-Salem Football Game Info

Fri., Nov. 3, 2023 @ 7p
The Sugar-Salem (Sugar City, ID) varsity football team won Friday's neutral playoff game against Timberlake (Spirit Lake, ID) by a score of 48-21.

Player stats

Rushing Yds/G
THS
C. Lenz95.1
SSHS
C. Harris134.2
Passing Yds/G
THS
SSHS
J. Chase141.3
Receiving Yds/G
THS
SSHS
Total Yds/G
THS
SSHS
J. Chase165.3
Tackles/G
THS
SSHS
Sacks/G
THS
SSHS
Points/G
THS
C. Lenz11.5
SSHS

Matchup history

2148

Team comparison

Rushing Yards/G
246.5
280.8
Passing Yards/G
150.8
148.7
Receiving Yards/G
149.9
148.7
Total Yards/G
397.4
429.5
Tackles/G
58.5
63.5
Sacks/G
1.3
2.5
Points/G
39.1
44.9
Pancake Blocks
-
-

Scoring averages

Q1Q2Q3Q4Final
Timberlake
5.83.66.415.238.6
Sugar-Salem
10.915.410.09.044.9

Season recap

Overall record
6-5
11-0
League
1-0
2-0
Non-League
4-4
6-0
Head to Head
0-2
2-0
Home
2-2
3-0
Away
4-2
4-0
Neutral
0-1
4-0
Playoff
1-1
3-0
In-State
6-4
9-0
Out-of-State
0-1
2-0
Win %
.545
1.000
Conference %
1.000
1.000
PF
425
494
PA
319
123
VIEW ALL

Common opponents

1 - 0
1 - 0

Rankings

ID
Division 3A
CANCEL
POST

Get Unlimited Access – for Free

See all the latest scores & stats from your favorite teams! Simply sign in or create your free MaxPreps account to unlock this page - it only takes a minute to join.