3
0
FINAL 9/12
  • Recap
  • Box Score
  • Team Stats
  • Awards
  • Matchup
S1S2S3Wins
RHS
2525253
MTHS
9750
Final score provided by D. Balser.
Raiders
Spartans

Attacking

SPKK/SKill %AttEHit %
#2 C. Largent300.0.000
#3 N. Chapman100.0.000
#4 C. Chapman100.0.000
#9 B. Boyer300.0.000
#11 C. Edwards341.340.0100.400
#12 Cundiff-barn...200.0.000
#13 E. Cordray331.050.061.333
#14 A. Edwards331.050.060.500
#15 E. Randolph393.075.0122.583
#17 M. Wolfe100.0.000
#21 R. Wilson100.0.000
#22 K. Weiss300.0.000
#23 M. Nicks221.016.7122.000
#32 G. Nichols3155.088.2170.882

Serving

SPAA/SAce %SASEServ %
#2 C. Largent310.320.05180.0
#3 N. Chapman100.0.010100.0
#4 C. Chapman111.011.190100.0
#9 B. Boyer331.042.970100.0
#11 C. Edwards300.0.000
#12 Cundiff-barn...221.016.7120100.0
#13 E. Cordray300.0.09188.9
#14 A. Edwards300.0.000
#15 E. Randolph331.027.3110100.0
#17 M. Wolfe100.0.010100.0
#21 R. Wilson100.0.02150.0
#22 K. Weiss300.0.000
#23 M. Nicks200.0.000
#32 G. Nichols362.042.9140100.0

Blocking

SPBSBATot BlksB/SBE
#2 C. Largent30000.00
#3 N. Chapman10000.00
#4 C. Chapman10000.00
#9 B. Boyer30000.00
#11 C. Edwards31120.70
#12 Cundiff-barn...20000.00
#13 E. Cordray30000.00
#14 A. Edwards30220.70
#15 E. Randolph31120.70
#17 M. Wolfe10000.00
#21 R. Wilson10000.00
#22 K. Weiss30000.00
#23 M. Nicks20000.00
#32 G. Nichols31010.30

Team summary

Kills Per Set
RHS
12.0
MTHS
3.7
Hitting Percentage
RHS
.492
MTHS
-.054
Total Blocks
RHS
5
MTHS
2
Digs Per Set
RHS
9.3
MTHS
5.7
Serving Aces
RHS
16
MTHS
0
Aces Per Set
RHS
5.3
MTHS
0.0
Digs
RHS
28
MTHS
17
Assists
RHS
31
MTHS
11
Kills
RHS
36
MTHS
11
Receptions
RHS
18
MTHS
55
VIEW ALL

Attacking

SP
3
3
K
36
11
K/S
12.0
3.7
Kill %
57.1
19.6
Att
63
56
E
5
14
Hit %
.492
-.054

Serving

SP
3
3
A
16
0
A/S
5.3
0.0
Ace %
22.5
.0
SA
71
23
SE
3
5
Serv %
95.8
78.3
PTS
-
3

Blocking

SP
3
3
BS
3
0
BA
4
4
Tot Blks
5
2
B/S
1.7
0.7

Digging

SP
3
3
D
28
17
D/S
9.3
5.7

Ball Handling

SP
3
3
Ast
31
11
Ast/S
10.3
3.7
BHA
-
54
BHE
-
1

Serve Receiving

SP
3
3
R
18
55
RE
0
15
R/S
6.0
18.3

North Carolina High School Volleyball - Mount Tabor overwhelmed by Reagan

September 12, 2024: Winston-Salem, NC 27106

The Reagan Raiders topped the host Mount Tabor Spartans volleyball squad by a final score of 3-0 in Thursday's league game.

Next up, the Raiders face the Chapel Hill Tigers (Chapel Hill, NC) in a non-league game, on Friday, September 13. Reagan will attempt to advance on its 16-3 season record. The Tigers go into the game with a 12-0 record after their 2-1 non-league win over Cleveland (Clayton, NC).

The Spartans (3-8) will now prepare for their game against Parkland (Winston-Salem, NC). The Mustangs go into the Central Piedmont 4A game with a 8-3 record. In their last game, Parkland went down by Davie (Mocksville, NC), 3-0, in a league game.

  • Reagan

    Congratulations to #32 Gabby Nichols for being selected the Reagan Volleyball Player of the Match.

Reagan @ Mount Tabor Volleyball Match Info

Thu., Sep. 12, 2024 @ 6p
The Mount Tabor (Winston-Salem, NC) varsity volleyball team lost Thursday's home conference match against Reagan (Pfafftown, NC) by a score of 3-0.

Player stats

Kills
RHS
MTHS
Total Blocks
RHS
MTHS
Serving Aces
RHS
MTHS
Digs
RHS
MTHS
Assists
RHS
MTHS
Receptions
RHS
MTHS

Matchup history

Team comparison

Kills
1400
494
Total Blocks
215
58
Serving Aces
343
207
Digs
1655
661
Assists
1238
443
Receptions
1686
1081

Scoring averages

S1S2S3S4S5Wins
Reagan
24.524.123.725.410.52.4
Mount Tabor
18.919.117.921.913.01.3

Season recap

Overall record
33-6
7-13
League
16-1
5-10
Non-League
5-1
2-3
Head to Head
2-0
0-2
Home
17-0
4-5
Away
7-4
3-7
Neutral
9-2
0-1
Playoff
4-1
0-0
In-State
28-4
7-13
Out-of-State
5-2
0-0
Win %
.846
.350
Conference %
.933
.357
SW
94
26
SL
22
45
VIEW ALL

Common opponents

2 - 0
0 - 2
3 - 0
2 - 0
3 - 0
0 - 3
2 - 1
0 - 2
2 - 0
2 - 0
2 - 0
1 - 1

Rankings

NC
Division 4A West
CANCEL
POST

Get Unlimited Access – for Free

See all the latest scores & stats from your favorite teams! Simply sign in or create your free MaxPreps account to unlock this page - it only takes a minute to join.